A New Kind of Facebook

posted by chip on 2008-11-05 04:05:01
I've been thinking about Facebook. An article likens Facebook to a "virtual student center" where people come to hang out online even though they can't meet face to face. And then I got to thinking... Why does Facebook have to have all the fun? Couldn't we spread that idea to the whole web?

The whole thing would have to center around personal expression and the connections we make with others. So first, there will have to be a kind of presentation language that people can use to create personalized spaces. And to show relationships, the language will have a way of referencing spaces created by other people — a "link" if you will. With these "spaces" and "links," we can create an an interconnected world that allows people to find others with similar interests.

And of course we must provide communication for our users. People like using different methods of communication for different situations, so we should provide an array of methods from casual to formal, point-to-point to broadcast. For casual communication, we'll create a simple instant messaging system, while more formal "mailbox" style messages will require a store and forward messaging system. There should be a public chat system and forums for public discourse. And of course, people will want a place to write entries that everyone can see, and inverting that idea, a system like the Facebook wall where everyone can post comments or congratulations. And of course, people will want a centralized way of organizing notifications for important events and postings to tie it all together.

To duplicate Facebook's "applications" we can create a standardized interface for writing interactive applications on the web which will use standardized methods for inter-site communications. The client-side of these applications can leverage existing Flash, Silverlight, and Javascript technologies for a truly next-generation experience. With an application platform in place, many useful web applications and widgets will be created by our users. People will no doubt also want to share pictures of themselves drunk at parties, so there should be an application that allows you to easily share photos with your friends.

And no system of such lofty information capacity should be without a search system. Unfortunately, it's beyond me how such a wide-reaching beast of a database could be designed, so I guess we'll just have to wait until an enterprising group creates such a system.

It's a lofty dream, but wouldn't it be great if we could create something like this? :D

reply

Marshal McLuhan has a comment!

posted by Marty on 2008-11-05 18:13:19
One of Marshal McLuhan (one of the pioneers of new media)'s most innovative ideas was that the content of a medium is always another medium. In this case, I believe this rings particularly true--the "medium" of Facebook isn't any new technology (as you said, much of the technology FB uses is nothing new), but another medium: a clever combination of existing technologies in an appealing way that draws people into their service.

I thought you'd be on board with this Web 2.0 kind of stuff man :)

reply

Another layer of indirection...

posted by chip on 2008-11-06 01:13:50
In software engineering we have another way of describing a medium inside a medium: the Inner-Platform Effect. It's the unfortunate result of adding functionality to a project's toolset until the toolset resembles the platform on which the project is based. What Facebook and Myspace have done is certainly appealing, but as a programmer, I find it to be mind-bogglingly retarded. They have created a smaller, less functional web inside the World Wide Web. But it's really worse than even that.

What FB and Myspace have created is a closed subset of the Web — a walled garden where its creators have absolute control. Abuse has already become apparent. Myspace at one time purged all references to Youtube from their service. Facebook hasn't been as heavy-handed, but it seems that they, too, are no strangers to censorship. The great thing about the Internet is that it's open and controlled by no one entity. There is a fundamental difference in terms of freedom between FB/Myspace and the wide-open web.

I'm not suggesting that people stop using these services, but at the same time, I don't think most people understand what it means to trust one company with so much of your online presence.

(Hello, AT&T!)

reply

All content printed on 100% recycled internet memes.